An alternative lens on Putnam's theory of the rise of "I" vs. "We" in the last 50 years. I have heard posited (and must admit I find appealing) the idea that the rise of I has come in large part due to the increased governmental programs that arose out of the great society. As we as a country rely more and more on government to solve problems, individuals no longer feel a responsibility for others since that has been outsourced to federal and local officials. Hence, individualism flourishes in a world of displaced responsibility. Of course it's hard to prove this; however, if it is indeed the case, progressivity may not yield the desired change.
An alternative lens on Putnam's theory of the rise of "I" vs. "We" in the last 50 years. I have heard posited (and must admit I find appealing) the idea that the rise of I has come in large part due to the increased governmental programs that arose out of the great society. As we as a country rely more and more on government to solve problems, individuals no longer feel a responsibility for others since that has been outsourced to federal and local officials. Hence, individualism flourishes in a world of displaced responsibility. Of course it's hard to prove this; however, if it is indeed the case, progressivity may not yield the desired change.